Science a GoGo's Home Page Forums General Discussion Not-Quite-Science Forum The newcomer: an opportunity to restudy comets.

The newcomer: an opportunity to restudy comets
The comet in fact is a fire mass thrown out of the sun following some local solar explosions; it goes forwards; it does not orbit the sun.
See our links
http://universeandquran.741.com
http://universeandquran.741.com/new_page_3.htm#Comets

An astronomer show to me the most recent image that he picked, and said to me: "The comet is not oblong; it is spherical; see this image! It is not flaming as you said!"
I answered him:
In case the object is far away and flaming, it will appear like this. And in case, the picture of this object is profile, it will appear like this.
It is Astronomers that say that the comet is not spherical.

May I ask: what distance (away from the sun) is required so that !! the dirty ice !! will boil [as you claim]? And will the ice on its surface melt, before its central ice?

Moreover, what makes such a relatively small inert object appear so luminous from such far distance? But that it is a fire object.

Refer to my previous article in the forum of the Chicago Astronomer http://astronomer.proboards23.com/index.cgi : The mistake of Astronomers about Comets.
And see this link at our website:
http://universeandquran.741.com/new_page_3.htm#Comets

eanassir
http://universeandquran.741.com

Comets are not balls of fire dispatched from the sun. Nor is the sun actually 'fire' as we commonly think of it. The sun doesn't generate energy from chemical interactions, but from nuclear interactions. ALL of the evidence that we have points to this as a basic fact. If a piece of the sun was shot out and away, the gravity wouldn't be sufficient to hold it together as a mini-sun.

Spectroscopy firmly established that comets were "dirty iceballs." They appear bright because their albedo is so high. Albedo is the percentage of incident light that is reflected. Why are venus and jupiter so bright when they are even farther away when we can see them? Not because they are "fiery," but because they reflect incident light!

Finally, we have slammed a "bullet" into a comet and gotten REALLY close-up pictures, making it even better established. We even have quite good (composite) pictures. Check out http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/07/science/07comet.html

Science isn't about taking a Holy Reference Manual and trying to confabulate ways of justifying its contents. That's pretend science. Real science is about trying to find out how things ACTUALLY work - and it starts with a careful examination of the available evidence.

This thread belongs over in "Not Quite Science."

I just remembered other evidence for clouds as 'dirty iceballs'. Look up the cause of the Leonids.

Of course such tremendous energy of the sun must issue from nuclear interactions of its constituents. The metals included in the sun is in liquid and vapor form, and it is very hot. But when a mass will separate from the sun it will become gradually cooler and its elements will start to solidify by time, as it will get away from the sun.

The spectroscopy will not say there is ice and dirt; but it will reveal some of the elements. And as they said they found for example OH, Na, … etc. This does not mean it is ice; it may be water in vapor form.

The object, which they slammed with some metallic piece, looked more like an asteroid rather than it is a comet. It was a large rock with some ice on its outer surface.

Moreover, the Glorious Quran includes a large number of Quranic revelations that pertain to the correct science; the science [revealing the might of God in the universe] confirms the Quran revealed from God – be glorified. And the Quran includes a large number of revelations that even are superior to the knowledge of this generation.

eanassir
http://universeandquran.741.com

There is no liquid in the sun, metallic or otherwise.


http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v324/n6096/abs/324436a0.html

"The ultraviolet spectrum of a comet's coma is dominated by emissions from the dissociation products of water, OH, H and O, and from secondary species: C, C+, CO, CO+, CO+ 2, S, and CS (ref. 1)."

If you want to understand the world, put down the religious blather and pick up a science book.