From that site: "Since the rate of influx of cosmic rays over time has not been constant, our climate has not been constant either."
This sentence is just as obtusely wrong as the GW fanatic's claims.
But aside from that, doesn't the IPCC account for this info. in their solar section? As I recall they attribute about 10-15% of the current warming to these "cosmic" effects. Is there some new info. about increased cosmic effects?
BTW, those comments about water vapor being 95% of the greenhouse effect (therefore CO2 can't be it) are very misleading (well, wrong basically). Do you subscribe to this viewpoint?
BTW2: I've just recently found some references to early work done on greenhouse effect. Surprisingly, some of the work was done by Angstrom and Roentgen (X-rays) back in the 19th century.
More later,
~SA
