Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 619 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 217
S
scpg02 Offline OP
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
S
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 217
IPCC Scientists Challenge Al Gore’s View of Global Warming Consensus

Posted by Noel Sheppard on June 29, 2007 - 13:36.

Quote:
The chinks in the armor that is a supposed scientific consensus regarding man’s role in global warming continued to grow this week when it was identified that many of the folks involved in the most recent report from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were not in agreement with the study’s findings.

Didn't hear about this? Well, how could you? Nobody reported it!

In fact, what you also didn't hear or read due to the media's universal eschewing of this information was that many of the views expressed in the IPCC’s report go quite contrary to assertions regularly being made by the very press outlets not covering this new revelation and the Global Warmingist-in-Chief, soon-to-be-Dr. Al Gore.

~snip~


http://newsbusters.org/node/13833

________________________________________________________________

News Release: Al Gore Confronted by Own Scientists

Written By: Tom Swiss
Published In: Heartland Perspectives
Publication Date: June 29, 2007
Publisher: The Heartland Institute

Quote:
(Chicago IL - June 29, 2007) On June 28, in an historic move the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has released the expert review comments and responses to its latest assessment of the science of climate change. The IPCC report is the primary source of data for Al Gore's movie and book titled "An Inconvenient Truth."

Many of the comments by the reviewers are strongly critical of claims contained in the final report, and they are directly at odds with the so-called "scientific consensus" touted by Gore and others calling for immediate government action.

~snip~


http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=21579


It's not Global Warming, it's Ice Age Abatement.
.
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 44
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 44
Ridiculous. This is just right-wing Neo-KKKon publications and sites saying there's a split on our side.
If this is the level of your scientific proof, then we indeed have not much to fear from that end.

But what are you worried about? You pollution-supporters have the financial resources of Halliburton AND the American Taxpayer on your side to create an unprecedented perfect PR-storm to convince the American Taxpayer that he could go on living like he has always done. To convince him that it's all "hogwash", right?
Pollutionists can run ads to get them out of this, just like they've always done. This how they sold the war, this is how they gonna convince everyone pollution is a myth.
Because in scientific matters, what is most important is what the uninformed folks believe, right? Right? Isn't y'all right?



Last edited by BrianPatrix; 06/30/07 12:23 PM.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
"Many of the comments by the reviewers are strongly critical of claims contained in the final report, and they are directly at odds with the so-called "scientific consensus" touted by Gore and others calling for immediate government action." -Tom Swiss :via S02.

"Claims" is one of the problems with this statement, but....

...and Gore represents only a small portion of the scientific consensus, so don't link those two that closely.

Those comments show that there is not a conspiricy to promote GW. I'd be suspicious if there weren't "critical" comments, "at odds" with points from the report. They look very fair and balanced to me.
I especially enjoyed the comments where the authors couldn't understand what the reviewer was trying to say.

Look at 9-199 (not an example of the above, but...) a very interesting point about CO2. This is from someone who had some comments rejected as being too much against the majority.
*can i say that legally?*

Anyway, if you look at those comments and replies, this "newsland-heartbusters" stuff looks pretty lame. IMHO

~SA


Pyrolysis creates reduced carbon! ...Time for the next step in our evolutionary symbiosis with fire.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5