Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 181 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#21187 05/02/07 09:47 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
samwik Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
I wonder if this is due to clearing and growth of grasses or some other succession.

http://www.geotimes.org/july03/NN_green.html

In the June 6 Science, Running and colleagues analyzed historical productivity data from a past generation satellite, AVHRR, covering from 1982 to 1999. “When you combine the Science paper with the two years of MODIS data, we see that the NPP of the terrestrial biosphere has increased over these 20 years. The world really has gotten more productive in plant growth, and the Amazon has had the highest increase in productivity rate,” he says.

They found that since 1982 the NPP is up 6 percent globally and is up 20 percent in the Amazon, which stands out on the new 2002 NPP map. Their historical data suggests that the productivity in the Amazon is accelerating faster than in areas of the northern high latitudes, such as Alaska and Canada, previously thought to be the fastest growing terrestrial carbon sinks. The leading cause of the global productivity increase, the Science authors suggest, is climate change with some contribution from carbon dioxide fertilization and forest regrowth.

~samwik


Pyrolysis creates reduced carbon! ...Time for the next step in our evolutionary symbiosis with fire.
.
samwik #21418 05/10/07 06:51 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
samwik Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
I recall an earlier thread (page 11) about a drier Amazon "growing" more. As the grasses replace the forest, they'll increase NPP (grassland NPP > jungle NPP) as well as dry out the area (also increasing NPP).

Sounds good, but a drier Amazon won't be good in the long run.

What strikes me is that even with the terrestrial NPP increasing (~1/2 GtC/yr), CO2 levels aren't falling.

I think it's because Marine NPP has fallen so much.
Not to say we shouldn't try to increase terrestrial NPP also (bogs and golf courses).

But for food and fuel we already appropriate 40% of terrestrial NPP. I think we should look to the marine NPP to increase our food and fuel resources.

~SA


Pyrolysis creates reduced carbon! ...Time for the next step in our evolutionary symbiosis with fire.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5