Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 699 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 120
W
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
W
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 120
The Quantum Zeno Effect is that physical phenomenon which causes the truth in the old adage, "A watched pot never boils." wink

(Sorry, couldn't resist. Quantum Physics humor - I have sunk to a new low.)

So two atoms bump into each other, and one begins to panic "I think I lost an electron!" The other asks, "Are you sure?" "Yes! I'm positive!"

Thank you, thank you. I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waitresses. Oh, and try the roast beef...


Okay, now that THAT'S out of my system...

I wonder if the Quantum Zeno Effect would be ameliorated by Planck Time? I'm not sure I'm using that term correctly, but it is basically the smallest possible measurement of time. This could ameliorate QZE two different ways: If we can't measure times shorter than Planck Time, then we can't have truly constant measurement. Or, and this is a bit more science fictiony but bear with me, if times shorter than Planck Time do not exist then the system being measured could change "between the frames" as it were.

That second possibility implies a universe that ages in frames like a projected movie. Is the universe digital or analog? If it's digital, then we are skipping to the next frame with each Planck instant and the second suggestion above is possible. If it's analog, then it's smooth but we can't measure it so the first suggestion is possible.

Just a few thoughts.

w

.
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,136
D
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
D
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,136
Indications are that it is digital, well we'd say quantized.

That there is a minimum quanta of time and that what we observe depends upon many factors.

That said I think there is ample evidence that there may be dimensions, or other factors, in which we have evidence of things happening that are not subject to time. Not that things travel faster than the speed of time but rather than things can happen that are time irrelevant.

One example is the movement of electrons around the nucleus of an atom. They do not smoothly orbit like little planets. They appear at one location and then, in the next instant, appear at a different location. What we draw as orbits is actually just a mapping of statistical probability as to where we are likely to find them.


DA Morgan
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,031
T
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
T
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,031
Wayne. I liked the one about the atoms. Do I have your permission to use it?

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 120
W
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
W
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 120
While I'm kinda proud of coming up with the thought of QZE keeping a watched pot from boiling, I'll have to admit that the atoms joke isn't mine. It's an old chestnut. Use it to your heart's content. smile

w

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5