Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 181 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#1638 06/09/05 02:53 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
P
Member
Offline
Member
P
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
Dear friends
Basically I have studied Einstein?s derivation of E=mc2 as given in Sep. 1905 paper.

I have completely analyzed, even Einstein has left his work incomplete.
Einstein's work is available at
Einstein?s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
If all cases are considered then it contradicts basic laws, This aspect is ignored by great Einstein.
My 40 page paper is in press in international journal from Canada. If you need it I will email you.
SINCERELY
AJAY SHARMA

.
#1639 06/10/05 02:54 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I have just gone through the Einstein's derivation and he has mentioned a constant C which is assumed to be the same for the two reference frames (which is not necessary)...
I guess Einstien's derivation is a special case...
There must be some generalized approach to the problem...
I excited to see your solution ...
Please send me the proof at the following id
onetreemanybranches@yahoo.com


Thanks

#1640 06/11/05 02:44 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 42
R
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 42
It's nice to see two researchers getting along.
I knew not all independant scientists are cranks.


Quantum Mechanics is a crashing Bohr.
#1641 06/11/05 08:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,136
D
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
D
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,136
To: PhysicsAjay

You wrote:
" Basically I have studied Einstein?s derivation of E=mc2 as given in Sep. 1905 paper."

Einstein didn't derive the equation you claim. Rather it is a simplification, for public consumption, based on conditions that do not exist in the universe to the best of our knowledge.

Others may be impressed by your body of work. I am still of the opinion that you have yet to demonstrate merit.


DA Morgan
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5