Science a GoGo's Home Page Forums General Discussion Not-Quite-Science Forum 360 million year old lamprey fossil

Still waiting for the answer about bacteria and protists. Thanks

Read the link Rusrty. It all but claims things must evolve.

eternauta posted:
Still waiting for the answer about bacteria and protists. Thanks

What's the point of your question?????

I did, which is why I'm now asking you to explain how you think the study you cite supports your assertions regarding the lamprey fossil.

Trilobyte wrote:

"No mutations are required for speciation."

Now I've already posted this quote on science discussion re. Amazon changing horses in midstream but, just for you Trilobyte, here goes again. From the creationist site:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i3/ligers_wolphins.asp

Quote: "In the case of three species, A, B and C, if A and B can each hybridize with C, then it suggests that all three are of the same created kind ? whether or not A and B can hybridize with each other. Breeding barriers can arise through such things as mutations."

terrytnewzealand,
You forgot the part that said..."not any new genetic information"

Why did you not quote the whole article? Why the deception?

Sorry DA. I can resist no longer.

Trilobyte. Would you mind telling me from where did I edit the piece you quote? Why should I quote the whole article when anyone who's interested can easily look for themselves? Of course quoting out of context is a weapon frequently used by creationists. Yet you are the one who accuses me of deception?