Welcome toScience a GoGo'sDiscussion Forums
 Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away. Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use. So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated. The Forums General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction
 You are not logged in. [Log In] Science a GoGo's Home Page » Forums » General Discussion » General Science Discussion Forum » Fermat (deception of physics) Register User    Forum List        Calendar         FAQ
 Who's Online 0 registered (), 207 Guests and 1 Spider online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 Latest Posts Is there anybody out there? by paul 12/07/19 03:58 AM
Top Posters (30 Days)
 True 1 paul 1
 Topic Options
 #141 - 10/23/04 11:28 PM Fermat (deception of physics) ben ito Junior Member Registered: 10/23/04 Posts: 10 Fermat's Last Theorem Ben Ito 10-22-04 I will solve Fermat's last theorem. l. Introduction I will show that Fermat (n=4) and Wiles' proofs are invalid then prove that x^n + y^Y = z^n only forms integer solutions when n>2 using the circle transformations. 2. Fermat's Proof (n=4) Fermat's Proof when n=4 is described (Savant, p. 22), (Osserman, p. 22). Fermat equation is represented with x^n + y^n = z^n. (equ 1) where n= 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,......... Fermat uses a transformation from n=1,2,3,4,5... to n = 4,8,12,20...... 4k where k=1,2,3,4,5,6,7........ Consequently, x-->X, y-->Y and z-->Z. The variables x,y,z asociated with n=1,2,3,4... and the variables X,Y,Z are assiociated with n= 4,8,12,20..... "If n= 4k, then y^n + y^n = z^n is impossible; X^4 + Y^4 = Z^4 in which X=x^k, Y=y^k, and Z = z^k." (Savant, p. 22). (equ 2) However, the transformation from n=1,2,3,... to n=4,8,12,20, equation 2 becomes part of X^4 + Y^4 + Z^4; therefore, equations 2 are valid. Fermat's proof is based on the assumption that equations 2 are not possible. 3. Wiles' Proof Wiles implies that Diophantine equations x^n + Y^n = z^n can be translated to described a set of elliptic curves. "These curves represent the surface of a torus, an object shaped like a smooth doughnut." (Savant, p. 30). However, the equation for an elliptic curve is y^2 = x^3 + ax^2 + bx + c; (equ 3) The largest power of an elliptic curves is three; therefore, to represent all values of n>3 violates logic. How can an elliptic curves represent n=20 which forms power of 20. Consequently, Wiles' Proof of Fermat's equation base on ellilptic curves is invalid. 4. B. Ito's Proof. Top
 .

 Hop to: General Discussion ------   General Science Discussion Forum   Not-Quite-Science Forum   Sci Fi Forum   Physics Forum   Climate Change Forum
 Newest Members debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT 865 Registered Users