Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 44 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
T
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
T
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
The Biophysical Society Executive Board issued the following statement regarding evolution, creationism, Intelligent Design (stealth creationism): http://www.biophysics.org/pubaffairs/evolution.pdf

From paragraph 3:
"What distinguishes scientific theories from these theological beliefs is the scientific method, which ... involves the formulation of hypotheses that can be refuted."

There are specific statements made by IDers (and other creationists) that are demonstrably false. But the general issue of ID is not science IN ANY SENSE, because it cannot possibly be falsified (refuted).

.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 636
J
jjw Offline
Superstar
Offline
Superstar
J
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 636
You, tff, are always on target.

From paragraph 3:
"What distinguishes scientific theories from these theological beliefs is the scientific method, which ... involves the formulation of hypotheses that can be refuted."

Contemplate another view that will not contemplate the prospect of challenge/refutation.

I want to think that Darwin's evolution provides comfort for my thoughts, but it is retarded in many ways. We can impeove the concept but not when it is put on the plain of "immaculate conception"
jjw

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
T
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
T
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
"I want to think that Darwin's evolution provides comfort for my thoughts, but it is retarded in many ways. We can impeove the concept but not when it is put on the plain of "immaculate conception""

I'm unable to interpret this.

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 636
J
jjw Offline
Superstar
Offline
Superstar
J
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 636
I was suggesting that Darwin's theory is offered much in the same way that religion is. It is beyound reproach and to disagree invites wrath.
ID is just another example of a poorly chosen basis for a belief. There are many, some on the WEB, that find fault with Darwin. I am hard pressed to understand his view as an explanation for everything we find here on Earth. My point was that I would like to think Darwin was right but I can not do it blindly. No argument here.
jjw

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 414
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 414
Quote:
Originally posted by jjw004:
I was suggesting that Darwin's theory is offered much in the same way that religion is. It is beyound reproach and to disagree invites wrath.
ID is just another example of a poorly chosen basis for a belief. There are many, some on the WEB, that find fault with Darwin. I am hard pressed to understand his view as an explanation for everything we find here on Earth. My point was that I would like to think Darwin was right but I can not do it blindly. No argument here.
jjw
I think it "invites wrath" because the people disagreeing with it almost invariably do so out of ignorance. Most of the people who argue against it, in my experience, are not interested in learning about it, but to denigrate it through specious arguments and mischaracterization. Their true goal is to eliminate the branches of science that might cast doubt on literal interpretations of ancient creation stories.

Evolution isn't an explanation for everything. It's only an explanation for the diversity of species that exist and have existed on this planet.


When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross."
--S. Lewis
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
T
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
T
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
"Most of the people who argue against it, in my experience, are not interested in learning about it, but to denigrate it through specious arguments and mischaracterization."

You've nailed it. There are idiots in every group. There are plenty of stupid people who just happen to believe in evolution. Some of these stupid people might blindly attack anyone who disagrees with evolution.

But the VAST majority of the criticism of anti-evolutionists is not directed at their disagreement. Dissenters are not lambasted by the scientific community for dissenting or for questioning. They're lambasted because they usually make idiotic assertions that demonstrate they haven't done the least bit of real homework on the subject.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokW
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5