|
0 members (),
646
guests, and
1
robot. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 560
Superstar
|
OP
Superstar
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 560 |
If I have two straws, with one having a radius that is 1/2 of the other, and I put the smaller one in the bigger one, and drink water through the two straws, what path would the water take and why?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 901
Superstar
|
Superstar
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 901 |
I would think more fluid would travel up around the outside of the smaller straw - there will be slightly more resistance in the central straw.
Try Googling it.
Blacknad.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 560
Superstar
|
OP
Superstar
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 560 |
Why will there be slightly more resistance in the central straw?
And if that "Try Googling it" statement wasn't sarcastic then you're just a weirdo.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 414
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 414 |
There's going to be some friction between the walls of the straws and the liquid, and since there is more surface area per volume in the smaller straw, there's going to be more friction on liquid passing through that one.
Have you tried googling it?
When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." --S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 560
Superstar
|
OP
Superstar
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 560 |
yeah. I have.
Thanks for the explanation, I see now...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 901
Superstar
|
Superstar
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 901 |
"And if that "Try Googling it" statement wasn't sarcastic then you're just a weirdo."
Weirdo I may be, but sarcastic I wasn't - I was trying to joke 'with' you, not at your expense.
Blacknad.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 560
Superstar
|
OP
Superstar
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 560 |
Yeah, I thought so... You should have included an emoticon to make it more clear that you were joking.
And you may be wrong, the same amount of liquid may travel up both straws but one at a slower rate, due to friction. Just a thought...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 901
Superstar
|
Superstar
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 901 |
I'll include emoticons, but I hoped you would know by now that I very rarely stoop to sarcasm.
As for the fluid - I can't see how the same amount of fluid will travel up the centre straw if it is slower. It is also not really about friction as I see it. It is simply that there is much more room around the inner straw so the flow will be much greater.
Regards,
Blacknad.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 414
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 414 |
Originally posted by Blacknad: As for the fluid - I can't see how the same amount of fluid will travel up the centre straw if it is slower. It is also not really about friction as I see it. It is simply that there is much more room around the inner straw so the flow will be much greater.
Regards,
Blacknad. It is about friction, and any other attraction between the fluid and the walls of the tube. See: http://www.engineersedge.com/fluid_flow/flow_velocity_profiles.htm
When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." --S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 901
Superstar
|
Superstar
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 901 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 636
Superstar
|
Superstar
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 636 |
Hi soilguy:
I just happened to notice this post.
I checked your link and it was informative.
When dealing with a straw within a straw takeing fluid from the same source with equal suction levels being applied does not the expeirment double the friction? The area within the larger straw has more then twice the surface contact than that contained in the smaller straw. Your link did not decide that hypothetical setup. Of cvourse, we do not have precise internal and external demensions for the straws or for their length, surface composition or the viscosity of the fluid involved. I doubt Google will help. Just an observation, I have tried to answer it. jjw
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 636
Superstar
|
Superstar
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 636 |
Correction / / / I have NOT tried to answer it. jjw
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Jim,
You can edit your own posts at any time by clicking on the paper and pencil icon at the top of the posting.
Amaranth
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 84
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 84 |
Actually, an interesting question.
Assuming that equal pressure is applied,(unlikely but what the hell...):
Take the dia. of the small straw as 2 unit, the larger at 4 units.
This gives: Area Cir. per. of Ratio of channel Area/Per. Small straw; 1 Pi 2 Pi 2 Pi. 1/2 Large straw; 4 Pi 4 Pi Outer Ch. ; 3 Pi(L-S 6 Pi(L+S) 1/2
Neglecting boundary layer width as a factor, (its effect being dependant on flow velocity and we don't know it anyway), the resistance should be the same. I would guess however that the boundary layer width in the narrower outer chanel would govern.
|
|
|
|
|
|