|
0 members (),
381
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
ok my god.As you wish ... as you take it. I have great respect for you and everyone. The point is if nobody takes you seriously then what do you expect anyone to do?
If I call myself a genius then in my opinion you are a greater one based on your essential role in the events..I delivered what you had asked for. It does not mean in anyway that I would have delivered even without you.
This is the reason why we are feeling this way. We are seprating the cause and effect as victory and defeat when there is none. We have all discovered a truth which can remain a solid background for all our discussions in future.
I have been simply telling the truth.
Few more words on the theory: It contains far more insights than we have discovered together.Every new idea from it is like a child coming into this world... with lots of pain and joy. On Personal remarks: On personal level I find lots of people around agreeing with me throughly.This provides them enough peace and hope to believe that yes they were always always so much right.The world was meant to be understood by everyone.I am sure they do not mind my occasional deviations from theory to myself.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 201
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 201 |
dkv:"I have great respect for you and everyone."
Actually you don't. This makes you also a liar.
dkv:"The point is if nobody takes you seriously then what do you expect anyone to do?"
Let me give you a piece of eastern and western wisdom: when several people tell you that you're drunk, you'd better go to sleep. Am I geting through to you?
"I delivered what you had asked for."
No one asked you to deliver any such thing. What you were asked to do was to learn more and talk less, and you certainly didn't deliver on that.
dkv: "We have all discovered a truth which can remain a solid background for all our discussions in future."
"We" haven't discovered anything. And you haven't either. So at least have the decency not to drag all the others through your misery and delusions.
dkv:"I have been simply telling the truth."
and I know at least four cases of Napoleons, two Wellingtons, and one martian that could also swear they are telling the truth about who or what they are. So your point is?
dkv: "On personal level I find lots of people around agreeing with me throughly."
Really? I challenge you to name them and provide the postings where they have "throughly" agreed with you.
dkv:"This provides them enough peace and hope to believe that yes they were always always so much right."
Boy, you really are sick.
dkv:"The world was meant to be understood by everyone."
And somehow, you are not among those who understand it.
kv:"I am sure they do not mind my occasional deviations from theory to myself."
Occasional? There is basically no post that you have writen where you haven't kissed yourself in the mirror! You are really delusional, and I mean this in the medical sense. Get some help, from qualified professionals.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,136
Megastar
|
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,136 |
Rose asks: "How presumptious and insulting can you get?"
Apparently quite a bit
dvk then writes: "I have great respect for you and everyone."
To paraphrase Pasti ... dkv: you are both a liar and a hypocrite.
DA Morgan
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So the liar says that the Universe has an intrinsic Spin just like electrons ... Can you believe it? I know all this without reading a book and taking drugs. And I can prove if you really wish to discuss it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,136
Megastar
|
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,136 |
Believe the universe has spin or believe that you know anything about the subject or believe that you can even define the term in terms of this thread.
DA Morgan
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Believe me for your own benefit.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 175
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 175 |
I think that kind of response should be reserved for the Origins board, dkv.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I thought this thread was about m-theory. Can we bring it back to the initial focus, please?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 636
Superstar
|
Superstar
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 636 |
Dkv from an earlier post of yours:
?This is my Theory... No literature has any reference to it. I am the creator... Now that?s not a joke. Instead take me seriously to discuss it further. I promise to solve all your problem if you tell me.?
On another listing there have been debates about the formula the E=mc^2.
I do not challenge the formula but I do wonder at the application. The formula requires that for it to be consistent the speed of light must be the same always or the Energy to be produced would vary, just as a change in the Mass would produce different results.
My interest has been concerned with the prospect that it has been established with some certainty that light speed will vary when the light encounters certain mediums. If the speed of light, other than in a vacuum, can effect the result of the energy produced by application of the formula how can the outcome of the application of the formula be predictable and reliable?
If you can respond with some mathematically reasoned result that will be very interesting but please avoid an esoteric type answer or I will not understand it. Thanks, jjw
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
My interest has been concerned with the prospect that it has been established with some certainty that light speed will vary when the light encounters certain mediums. If the speed of light, other than in a vacuum, can effect the result of the energy produced by application of the formula how can the outcome of the application of the formula be predictable and reliable? REP: Speed of Light as they say in classical GR remains the same.Certain mediums change it due to interaction with photons(changing the state of atoms). But the underlying fact remains same with respect to light.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I do not challenge the formula but I do wonder at the application. The formula requires that for it to be consistent the speed of light must be the same always or the Energy to be produced would vary, just as a change in the Mass would produce different results. REP: To bring alive this discussion I guess you want one more answer. Simple answers are already given in the book. I share my theory not be called a thief. And an ungratefull nation doesnt hesitate in proving it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 636
Superstar
|
Superstar
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 636 |
DKV:
I do not have any idea what you are saying. I suggest you ignore my question as too speculative and that will suffice. jjw
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by dkv: Ok so again it got deleted.
Hope it makes some sense. It didn't.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
May I know why? Give me a glimpse of some logical reasoning.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by dkv: May I know why? Give me a glimpse of some logical reasoning. You were totally off topic and off the wall. That's two strikes right there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,136
Megastar
|
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,136 |
dvk wrote: "The target was to show the Universe holds the intrinsic Spin. Which is part of m-theory which says any dimension of thought can be translated into a State. And it necessarily includes Spin of the Universe itself."
No it isn't. There isn't anything in m-theory, quantum membranes, that has anything to do with "dimension of thought."
Rose ... use a machete. dvk .... you were compeltely off-topic and if you can not see that then please add 2+2 and come up with seeking professional help.
DA Morgan
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by dkv: Stupid Morgan... Membranes are undetectable.
It gets worse from here.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Yes indeed it gets worse than ever. Give a thought to joining a class on Logic and Deductive Analysis.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
After you, my dear Alphonse!
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by dkv: Lets talk logic : Binary Logic is well understood ... What about Fuzzy Logic? ...[content deleted] But in the end it is the Self or Your Self which gives you the final answer. Circular logic is not logic. This is a Science forum, not the local psychiatric ward.
|
|
|
|
|
|