Originally posted by DA Morgan:
dehammer there is/was no "in" and/or "out" and I can't think of a single serious proposal in physics that corresponds with your statement.
evil:
Matter and antimatter are NOT complete opposites. There is a lot of support for the proposition that the differences, however small, were enough that more matter was created. For more information on this check out:
http://www.llnl.gov/str/VanBib.html
http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/experiments/bfactory.html once again, the science class that I've referred to before is showing its effect. i read or heard about a lot of theories, many of which have been discredited in the succeeding decades, but which at the time were possible. as i pointed out, they don't have much following or did not at that time. some of them have been proven wrong, while others are against accepted theory. there was one that was not accepted when it came out, that i believe is now accepted, that was a carbon molecule (i believe) called a bucket ball (or something close to it) that is close to being the perfect lubricant. not every one has been discredited. i don't know enough about antimatter/matter to know if these have been discredited.
one thing that is 'commonly' accepted (possible another urban myth) is that antimatter reacts the opposite as matter does. for it, a push is a pull, and vice versa
