I said I would try to get a scientific question in before discharge, so here goes.

Sean Carroll says: "The microscopic laws of physics draw no distinction between past and future". He uses this to justify pages of argument in support of the need for a Past Hypothesis in order to make sense of the present.

Surely, this basic assumption is flawed. Reactions of kaons, B particles and some atomic reactions show clear time asymmetry.

Have i missed something?

There never was nothing.