Originally Posted By: newton
CW or CCW we have red or blue shift

Correct

Quote:
( ZERO is impossible during test on Earth)

WRONG

You are correct it won't be zero (absolute phase equalization) by default but earths movements is constant because of it's sheer inertia size so you can zero to the offset using some more smart science tricks.

Ligo ADDS NEW SYSTEMS inside the Michelson interferometer the first of which is called a Fabry–Pérot cavity in each arm.

Start here:
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabry–Pérot_interferometer

Now there are even more systems we have yet to discuss in LIGO.

You keep describing LIGO as a Michelson-Morley interferometer and it is not it is a heavily modified michelson interferometer.

You understand one of about 20 systems within LIGO and without understanding what those other systems do, think we should listen to you? That is why everyone ignores you because you won't listen or learn how LIGO works but like a child insist on making naive and silly comments.

This is what LIGO REALLY LOOKS LIKE


Even this does not do it justice as each of those systems is extremely complex.

Here is the calibration data for the LIGO for the period it discovered the gravity wave.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.03845v1.pdf
The shear number of scientists and universities on the paper tells you how carefully the calibrations were checked.

A telling detail is they use the doppler effect caused by the motion of the earth to position the gravity wave event. Marosz however claims LIGO are not aware of that very same doppler effect ???????

So you need to go thru each system in LIGO in detail and show us the error.

Scientists are telling you doppler variation is dealt with and they have calibration results to prove it, so just saying we are wrong makes us laugh and yes we ignore you.

So your post is blatantly wrong because it is too big a simplification. Do you wish to change the argument of that post by going into more detail?

Last edited by Orac; 03/16/16 08:46 PM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.