I'm not upset , its more like I'm disgusted with science.
particularly when people claiming to be scientist insist
that creation did not happen yet when confronted with
a logical question such as the Cambrian explosion they
then either change the subject or try to claim that evolution
started after all the fully formed animals were already here.
which is exactly what the evolutionist claim today because
they cannot find what is not there.
so instead of handling the Cambrian explosion in a scientific
manner they stop being scientific because they don't want to admit that creation was the only way that fully formed
animals could have just suddenly appeared on the earth and being proud scientist they continue by making claims that creation did not happen and they do this with no evidence that science can possibly support.
what do you think that the odds are that a single fully formed
animal complete with eyes , skeleton , legs , arms , respiratory system , digestive system , brain , etc ... etc ... etc ... etc ... etc ... could just pop into existence?
and then add to your popping equation all the other known
animal species from the Cambrian explosion that have been discovered that have absolutely no evolutionary connection to a animal that existed prior to the Cambrian explosion.
what would be the odds of creation being true?
to me creation isn't a faith based belief it is a
logic based belief that is not associated with faith.
to evolutionist evolution is a faith based belief that cannot
be associated with logic.
at the end of the day evolution causes science to become illogical and causes science to blend in with faith based
offshoots such as evolution that some claim as being scientific but are not.
religion is religion and science is science , religion
is faith based but science is not.
science is based on evidence.
therefore evolution is not science.
