I lose? when have we ever been discussing anything
where I was wrong , Bill?

think about it and let me know because you said that

I lose again...

to keep my record of winning going , I would like to
point out that there was only a two second time period
between valve opening and heat lamp start up.

2 seconds ...

and the tube looks as if it is at least 10 ft long !!!

now tell me Bill , why would any competent scientist need
a ten foot or longer tube to connect the CO2 bottle to
the glass canister?

I already know why , he wanted to show how horrible
the global warming is supposed to be , so he decided that
in order to heat up the CO2 he would need to expose the CO2
to some heat source before the CO2 entered the canister
thus the 10 ft length of
plastic tubing ( the CO2 heater required for needed results ).

it would take more than 2 seconds to fill the tube with
such a low flow rate according to the degree of valve opening
that was applied , and the heat lamp would easily heat
the CO2 before it reached the glass canister.


although you have launched a preemptive boasting attempt
it didn't work , and I might add , you lose again !

also you didn't comment on the same thermometer being used
in the video to prove the horrors of global warming.



3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.