I have heard this type of load before , but with the
evidence shown in the video you don't seem to have
much of a load except in your pants, that are on fire , Bill

to be plain and simple that is a load of crap if I have ever heard one.

a vector analysis ...

LOL

Quote:
So once again as always gentle readers Bill is making unsupported claims just before he gentle readers you sheeple


Quote:
If you do a vector analysis of the 2 primary forces you will find that they sum up to provide a force directly opposite the centripetal force and equal in magnitude.


yea you should really try that one Bill.

I didn't think you knew what you were talking about , but now I'm certain beyond a shadow of a doubt that you really don't know what you are talking about.

or your simply protecting a part of the science cult.

if you think that because the 2 primary forces will add up to the centripetal force provided by the wheel and that will stop
the wheel from turning , then there never would have been a wheel that would have ever turned , LOL...

because the centripetal forces always add up to the centrifugal forces ( the outward force ) and when they
don't add up ( if centrifugal is higher than centripetal ), then something is going to break.

that's the reason we study centripetal ( inward force ) and
centrifugal ( outward ) forces.

so we will be able to determine if a mechanism can withstand
the forces in rotation.

BTW , I already know that science claims that
centrifugal force is a pseudo force.

but science uses centrifuges everyday.

I hope your not going to stoop to using that in your next load of crap...









3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.