I can make the same argument of you about religion infact I could do it line by line from your comment if you want?

Lets abbreviate it

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

- Have you ever seriously considered and studied the fact there may be no god
- Have you ever seriously considered and studied the fact god may have a god
- Have you ever seriously considered and studied the fact god may have limits

Your religious investigations have been limited by your religious belief?

you closed the door yourself.
you decided to be a follower , not a leader

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

See the problem with that argument Paul it cuts every way.

I understand those items will cause you a degree of distress and I did it not to be malicious but to make a very specfic point.

We all have personal views and bias and those lead to certain things we blindly accept which are totally personal.

Such biases may indeed make us wrong about the thing we blindly accept but it doesn't make us neccessarily bad at them.


I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.