Science a GoGo's Home Page Forums General Discussion Physics Forum Need for Dark Matter Questioned

I have good QM grounds to disagree and this is one area where particle physics is colliding head on with QM.

An anti-particle is simply a reversal of charge. From a QM field theory perspective this is called the Feynman-Stueckelberg interpretation (after Ernst Stueckelberg & Richard Feynman)

Background is at the bottom (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiparticle)

It leads to a conclusion => antiparticle have equal mass m and spin J but opposite charges q.

Given Feynman-Stueckelberg interpretation contains our good old favourite renormalization I won't call the theory dead but lets just say it's against the current best QM understanding and I would require observational evidence before I would throw Feynman-Stueckelberg interpretation out.