Here's another couple of comments.
He (you?) says that gravity doesn't require gravitons to be travelling because it doesn't require any continual supply of energy to maintain the curvature of spacetime.
However, the conventional theory uses virtual gravitons, not actual gravitons. The virtual ones don't use up energy. It's similar to the way electric charges use virtual photons continually exchanged in order to maintain the electrostatic force between them. They're not using up energy, but those virtual photons still have to mediate the force.
"Black-Holes ... isolating, insulating, and inactivating the electrical charges of the protons.
Almost ALL electrons are freed outside of the Black-Holes C-R. If the Black-Hole C-R is eating, it will leave evidence of excess electrons escaping from it’s vicinity."
A black hole violates conservation of electric charge? Why aren't "almost all" electrons trapped in a black hole along with the other bits of their atoms?
Overall, I think giving it a funny name doesn't make it any different from all the other non-formalized theories based on words and analogies that are equally unsuccessful and lacking in predictive ability.
