Originally Posted By: Mike Kremer


My Question was "has any man that has been circumcised as a baby......ever vocally complained of being mutilated later in life? I think no,...not ever"



Hi,
You're flatly wrong. Hundreds of thousands of men are enduring a tedious process of non-surgical foreskin restoration to undo just someone of the damage due to foreskin amputation.

Originally Posted By: Mike Kremer
Just why would any full blooded male of 18 or 20 years old just starting out to have his first sexual experiances, having been without a foreskin for 20 years suddenly think he should get it put back again?? Why and for what possible reason?


Because without the protective sheath the glans and the mucosal surface adjacent to it become dried and dull like the outside of your lips, instead of smooth, moist, and supple, like the inside of your lips. The penis head IS NOT skin, it is mucosa.

Also, the slinking of the slack skin during intimacy simply FEELS REALLY good. Until you have enough slack for the skin todo this rolling during arousal you simply don't kow what the Meisner's Corpuscles (specialized pleasure receptive nerev organelles) inyou skin were meant to do for. It's really like seeing in a new color when you starting sensing this awesome feeling. Google "rolling gliding action of skin tube" and you'll probably see some video. The skin also improves feel of intercourse for a receptive partner.

Originally Posted By: Mike Kremer

A man without a foreskin for 20 years is very lucky in the fact that his penis is much less sensitive, and is therefore able to indulge in the sexual act for very much longer than others.


That's wrong. Studies prove that prematurity is not related to a measurable difference in sensitivity. It's a learned behavior. There are long-lasting lovers the world over who are intact (about 80% of all men are, most of the cut men on earth are Muslims cut for religious reasons).

Originally Posted By: Mike Kremer

You also say that there are thousands of hospitals who 'repair or rebuild' mens foreskins every year???


That was wrong. It's NON-surgical. It's done by tensioning the surviving skin.

Originally Posted By: Mike Kremer

Mike Kremer said, yes you are wrong...rebuilding?...tensioning?
Look, it is the same today, that there are dozens, even hundreds of men who actually have their foreskin removed. by Hospitals...
All for medical reasons...ie... their foreskin does not retract fully, or that it is too tight over an engorged penis, or that it has become swollen, infected and painful from germs incubating under a damp dirty smegma foreskin.


The rate of adults choosing circumcision is about 2 per 1000.

Tight foreskin is resolved by a few months of gentle stretching with Betamethasone ointment. Infections are treated with antibiotics, not amputation. The foreskin is no more an incubator for pathogens than the vagina is. BOTH REQUIRE beneficial bacteria to be healthy.

Originally Posted By: Mike Kremer

She used to get fed up with the uncircumcised spraying their wee wee, all over the toilet seats and floors, that she had to clean up.


How could she possibly know which droplets came from which penises in which state? Any male should flip the seat up and aim for the whole bowl, or better yet, sit. It's cleaner because the fluid is not released so far above the water line and there is less splatter; it has nothing to do with a fine stream. But in fact an intact guy can easily fully or partially retract and squirt like any cut guy.

NOT ONE national medical association of doctors on earth (not even Israel's) endorses routine circumcision. As such it is cosmetic surgery.

Holland's very up-to-date 2010 policy says of circumcision: "KNMG is calling upon doctors to actively and insistently inform parents who are considering the procedure of the absence of medical benefits and the danger of complications." They also say there is actually a good case to make it illegal.