Sometimes I wonder whether you just deliberately lie about things.
The problem that you refuse to see, is the
acknowledged problem of having no suitable replacement for the shuttle.
The saturnV would not be the best choice - the ability to lift mass into orbit has nothing to do with the ability to go to the moon.
As usual with the Geek, he just claims (lies?) the Saturn V is not the best choice,... but I can equally state that it is the best choice.
And, at least, I can give one valid reason.
A Saturn V can lift some 135,000 kgs (300,000 lb) to low earth orbit (LEO).
This is SEVEN times the payload of the shuttle.
That seems good to me.As to the Geek's moronic comment, that, "the ability to lift mass into orbit has nothing to do with the ability to go to the moon." Well,... that is just ridiculous. Even ordinary folk should suspect that, that statement, is total trash.
The Geek's understanding of physics has obviously not been improved by his absence.
