Originally Posted By: kallog

Here's a thought, it violates:
Netwon's 1st law
Newton's 2nd law
Newton's 3rd law
The law of conservation of momentum

Am I the only one who see's the irony here - paul's little "invention" fall foul of four of the most basic laws of physics. These laws have stood the tests of time, and been validated time and time again - take Noether's proof conservation of momentum.

But kellog and I are the ones who are "crazy" because we don't think his device won't work.

Someone needs to read up on the history of perpetual motion ...