Thank you Uncle Al for you comments:
I was gone yesterday and could not acknowledge your reply

We tend to see what we recognize first until we may read again. I think a quirk is not an error. Newton?s work is still supreme with me. I am thinking in terms of Mass like Jupiter being about 313 times that of Earths and looking for some manifestation of that difference in relationship to the Sun.

Note at http://www.spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Sgravity.htm (2/11/2005)

On page two about 2/3rds of the way down the page they recite:

?(Please note: gravity is not what gives the moon its velocity. Whatever velocity the moon has was probably acquired when it (moon) was created. But gravity prevents the moon from running away, and confines it to some orbit.)?

You may tell them the word is ?gravitation?, or not as you may desire.

We are well aware of the interplay between solar objects and that Newton?s work was the breakthrough in those determinations. BUT we have the most massive planet revolving around the sun with little velocity when compare to the Earth, for example. My ?quirk? was aimed at the apparent lack of proof that large massive objects are imparting any extra energy or force to the every day mechanics of this Solar System based on what we know of Newton?s Laws of Gravity.

Read it any way you wish. It is all in fun.
Jim Wood, jjw004