That view depends on straight "naive realism". The alternative argument is that "causality", "occurences" and "laws" are merely transient agreements between observers aimed at their attempts to "predict and control". It is the height of intellectual chauvinism to assume that humans who have "just arrived" cosmologically speaking, and who have only recently agreed on "the big bang", will not come up with radically alternative paradigms, concepts of "universe", and even "existence" itself, perhaps even in our own lifetimes.

Creationists need to realize that their construction of "a creator" is merely a catch-all "controller" for that which escapes their own limited control.