I am taking your words at their face value.

Coberst said: "Were we better off in a state of nature?

How credible was the concept of the Noble Savage?"

I was answering those questions and personally I do not have any desire to return to a pre-civilised state where the description of life as being "nasty, brutish and short" seems only too accurate. If however you mean would be better if we lived a life which did not "glorify war, violence, soldiers, and sexualisation of
children" (amongst other things) I should probably agree with you. I would not however agree that we should all become Amish, because , much as I admire them, they deny the very thing that is best in humanity, that is the curiosity and zest we have for life, and the exploration of our world.