I am scared that people who fight Global Warming are seen as the new establishment. Thus, just to be contrary, a lot of people will have opposite opinions. But, just because lotsa people say something doesn't mean its untrue, especially if its backed by rigorous science. And especially if the other side amounts to 'science' of the (un-)intelligent design level.
Also, pointing out errors in the science on both sides is all good and fine, but if it leads to sitting on the fence with this issue ... that would be bad. Just because Al Gore got it 10 percent wrong doesn't mean that his main assertion should be completely rejected: mankind is causing climate change, and it will kill us all if we don't change it. Instead of 'kill' you can read: harm significantly.
In the 18th or 19th century the debate whether Africans were real humans or animals also lead to this notion that they should be somewhere between monkeys and man. These middle of th road conclusions can be quite dangerous and utterly wrong.
