Originally Posted By: terrytnewzealand
Thanks Mike. A couple of things especially interesting...............
Means it's basically a recessive gene, although just one or two bases hardly makes a gene. Another one:
"but is next to two catalogued anti-cancer genes"

Seems, once again, that a gene that aids one thing has a downside for something else. It's all a delicate balancing act.

You are so right Terry.
There is always a 'downside' to every 'upside'

S'why I dont believe we should 'antagonise/mess' with Nature.

But, using Nature to help repair and recover, stem-cell, and gene therapy could be the long term answers, rather than
'Biotics and chemical medicines?

Mike Kremer