Ok MOrgan, if someone goes to you, hey that theory of yours has some limitations. Then someone gives a dataset to backup their assertion, you have a duty to listen. If the said someone shows the dataset from a reliable source then hey it has to be evaluated. Otherwise we shut the door to the dissenting voices. Fine if your running a religion, not so fine if you are posing as one with value.
quote Da Morgan "If you don't understand aerodynamics you've no business designing airplanes"
Well if someone produces a dataset that asserts you have the stress levels on the wings of the airplane incomplete you listen. remember the disater with the space shuttle when the data was ignored re the O ring seals in the booster tanks. the dissenting voice was drowned out by the overwhelming need to do something. So lets look at the whole picture and evaluate those with dissent voice(that offer a dataset based on tested information).
