perhaps the answer is that you are not accepting their cherry picked benchmarks as gosple. Alarmist have to use those benchmarks to prove how bad things are getting. The data you used is straight, unaltered, "uncorrected" data, which they cant explain without "correcting". other than that, i dont know why any one cant answer them.
I notice that the first link you had explained that the solar energy had only risen a fraction of a percent. Notice they discuss solar energy, rather than solar flares which are totally different animal. From what that says, id would hazzard a guess that they are not taken flares into account, nor the magnetic effects the flares have, and the effect that have on the earth. something that i find interesting is that they show in their chart that the natural tendacy of the temperature should have dropped, even though solar activity has been on the upswing most of the last century. how do they explain that if they took it into account.
