Let me try to explain my idea more clearly. I think it's somewhat radical.
For example. Each "ghost in the machine" has the same identity. Each of us have our internal dialoge, but there's also the observer of our internal dialoge. The abstract individual identity that watches us through our experiences: grief, anger, whatnot.
REP:Without complicating things I think it is best possible to understand Brain as a group of I's.I mean Qunatized Information Space with different specializations. Primarily all individuals are associated with the Larger Information BalckHolish I. And this is the reason when asked our brain creates multiple answers. But ultimately the decision to correlate and associate all the information into One comes down one section of Self.This is called I(whether or not it is a fixed area is different subject matter). Thus whether you only analyze the information(by looking internally) or you observe and react (by looking externally) ... the same "I" comes into picture as it has the responsibility to associate with all other I's in your brain.Thus you as an I is one and only one.All others are just your senior officers of your body orgnaization.You are the king of yourself.And I just dont mind if somebody calls me King !!:-))
==========================================
So when I generate an idea that's somehow grasped by my observer or innermost being, then the idea filters down into my internal dialogue where I put my idea into words.
REP: I think you should abandon the sequential processing Idea.Brain doesnt like to porcess sequentially.You generate Idea like an Organization.What are you depends upon your affinity for the type of post you would like to hold in your head.
===========================================
This is where all my genetics and learned social behaviors modify my expression of the originall idea because for example, I'll use learned language affected by my culture, my education, even my gender. It's proven women tend to use passive language while men use more competitive wording.
REP: Yes. Differences are there in the attitudes and Amplitudes of Men and Women.AS women and men associate different meanings to real life.AS they understand each other they understand how weak they are with respect to the other.
==========================================
And then in order for another person to communicate with me, they read my language choices and filter it through their own judgements based on their personality, education, backround, etc. And could either resonate or bulk at my original concept causing their innermost being to feel as though it's a completely different identity.
REP:The information and processes are different but not I.In some accidents the "I" can get completely lost making the person incapable of thinking inside or outside..
==========================================
But perhaps we have one innermost identity looking out of millions of different eyes or windows.
REP: Yes thats what I said ... You are group of I's and with some one more intelligent at handling information.Which you should call as I.
=========================================
So the death of an individual's consciousness is more like a universal consciousness shutting or blinking an eye.
REP: We will try to discuss it in a seprate thread.
=============================================
So I'm not really talking to "you", I'm merely having a conversation with myself. Taking into account layers and layers of filters between me and me.
REP: Hmm .. thats a crazy idea unless you can prove me that I do not exist.:-))