Thank you JJWOO4 and DAMorgan for your replies. Upon further reflection my post seemed like and editorial, lol. When I came upon "Hempel's Dilema"; I thought about what science means today. DA, are things so black and white? If this is the case then why is there so much that we do not understand? If the laws of physics are constant (no matter what century we live in) then why do we keep re-interpreting them?
I know that you seek to refine problems to their absolute basic core; stripping away all layers of nonsense and hypotheticals.
I suppose that what I am asking is, "Is science good enough"? Are we satisfied with what we know.. Does it matter a damn what you or I think to be true if in 500 years we are perceived to be delusional? LOL.
I really do wish that things were so clear; that our acumen was keen and our understanding- penetrating. How do you respond to the fact that science is self-correcting..if one believes that pure logic, alone, gives enlightenment?
Sincerely,
